Thursday, March 26, 2015

You're Never Too Young - Seven Year Olds Ignite


About a week before Spring Break I was asked if I thought one or two of my grade one or two students would be interested in putting an ignite session together for our district digital dinner series. If you're not familiar with the ignite format it is where you tell your story in 20 slides. Each slide is shown for exactly 15 seconds for a total presentation time of five minutes.

 My initial reaction was that I really wasn't sure it was something I could organized with so little "spare" time. Report cards going home, parent teacher conferences, a field trip, presenting a full day workshop, and of course a two week Spring Break adventure in Europe.  But when presented with a challenge I have  a lot of trouble backing down and late that evening  I fired off emails to three of my grade two families explaining the possible opportunity for their children. Then I waited.

My first reply came back quite quickly. Both mother and daughter were interested. Not long after the second response came in.  I had two children interested in sharing their story with a room full of educators. Did I mention it was a room full of 280 educators from classroom teachers, to the school district's most senior team.  At this point there was no turning back.

I quickly arranged an after school  meeting with the ladies and their families.  I took a large piece of paper and folded it into several small boxes. Then I asked the girls what they felt was important to share with the teachers and principals. They started talking. As they talked I filled in the boxes with their ideas. "I like Minecraft". "I got a lot of comments on my blog".  "I am a better writer on my blog". "We have a lot of iPads in our class". "When you write in your journal only your teacher, classmate, and visitors can see it. When you write on your blog the world can see it". The girls talked and I listened and wrote. After about an hour of talking we had a page full of ideas.



I went home and looked at all they had wanted to share to find some order to it all.  I also created a google slides presentation and shared it with both families.  The goal was that all three of us (me and the two families) were going to add images to the document so we would have our slide deck.  That night I combed the images that I already had of the ladies, or of our classroom in action and found places for them to go into the slide deck.  The thing was though that at any time either student could remove the images I had put in and add their own.  At this point it was Spring Break and I was off on my adventure and the girls were off on theirs.

The goal was that over the break we'd all find some time to add to the slide deck but the reality was none of us had much time to do that. A few slides were created over the two weeks, but only a small few.  When I landed back in Canada, less than 48 hours before they were to present  we all went right back to creating slides.

Monday we spent part of the morning reviewing the stories the girls wanted to tell.  Together we wrote a script but I quickly discovered that with a script my students just wanted to read it. They didn't need a script, then just needed to talk about their slides.

Tuesday they practiced a bit more and shared it with their classmates. We let the rest of the class know that their presentation was on behalf of our entire class.  They received thumbs up approval from their classmates.

After school the ladies went home to change and spend time with their families.  They then arrived at the venue. To their surprise they both wore the same shoes! For two seven year olds this was a really big deal. A total coincidence too.


They sat through the first ignite but as interesting as it was it was tough for seven year olds to sit still for so we headed out of the room.  I grabbed my laptop and put their presentation on it where they practiced a couple more times. Finally it was their turn.

I have to tell you, I am so impressed with how confident they were.  From the outside it seemed that they were not phased at all by the 280 grown ups looking at them.  Dr. Carlson introduced them and away they went.

As they spoke the district twitter feed lit up. I captured the tweets on this storify. 

I can't tell you how proud I am of them sharing their story with so many. They spoke with confidence and pride.  There is most certainly a reason why they were the final ignite session. Who could go after such wonderfulness?


Curious to hear what they had to say?  Take a listen. You won't be disappointed.



Tuesday, March 17, 2015

If It Isn't About Pedagogically Sound Practices, Using Technology MostLikely Isn't the Answer You're Looking For

"What are the biggest mistakes teachers make when integrating technology into the classroom?"
Since my grade one and two students are 1:1 with iPads, I am always looking for better ways to use devices for learning.  Along the way however I have seen a lot of less than ideal ways to use technology in the classroom. Here are some examples.  
1) I am still surprised to see people creating PDFs as a way to make their classroom paperless, when little thought has been given to the quality and purpose of the content going "digital.” If a worksheet was not in line with the best practice without technology, how does it suddenly become best practice with technology. Replacing paper with expensive devices is just something I can't wrap my head around.
2) I often read about people who are trying to use technology in their practice to make their lessons more "fun".  Last time I checked you don't need technology to have "fun" lesson. All lessons should be engaging, meaningful and delivered in a way that students have fun learning.  Pretty quickly technology will lose its fun factor if good teaching doesn't prevail.
3) A lot of people who use technology expect every child to use it the same way.  While yes, I am in a 1:1 iPad environment, my students still have choice and they are never required to use technology to learn if it isn't the best way for them.  When technology becomes the only way for a student to show what they know we have another problem.  And far too often there are way better ways for children to learn.
4) Some teachers rely on technology as a drill and practice device instead of using it to its full potential as a creation device.
5) The biggest mistake I see with the integration of technology is teachers who are not taking full advantage of what their devices can do and how it can positively support student learning. I am thinking specifically for those children who have trouble learning in "traditional" ways.   iPads can help read to a student, change spoken word into written text, increase the size of letters, help with text predictability.  There are so many other great accessibility features that can help support pretty much any struggling student. They can and should be used to break down barriers and help allow every student be successful with their learning.  If you have learners who are challenged in one way or another please get to know what your device can do to help support your learners.
So while I truly believe technology can transform learning, it must always be superseded by pedagogically sound practice. Utilizing technology with purpose in mind can lead to new and innovative ways for students to learn. It is important that we are looking for better teaching and learning practices when we integrate technology into our classrooms.

*This post is part of a series of monthly questions that Cathy Rubin is asking several education bloggers to respond to.  This month's question was "What are the biggest mistakes teachers make when integrating technology into the classroom?" It is an honour to be a part of this group.  Please check out the complete list of posts here. 

The Global Search for Educations: Our Top 12 Global Teacher Blogs - What are the biggest mistakes teachers make when integrating technology into the classroom?

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Using An iPad to Enhance a K-3 Numeracy Program

I recently presented a workshop on using an iPad to Enhance a K-3 Numeracy Program.  Since I often have a tendency to overwhelm as I present I decided it might be a good idea to create an iTunes U course as a way to help those who attended have time to reflect on the day through the course.  But of course in Karen style if I'm going to put a lot of time into a project that I think can benefit others I share it beyond my session.



Here's my latest iTunes U course entitled Using An iPad to Enhance a K-3 Numeracy Program.  You can find it here. https://itunesu.itunes.apple.com/enroll/CAL-XPH-LBK

Remember this course is designed to work on an iPad and is best opened in the iTunes U iOS app.

And if you're wondering, of course it's free!

Saturday, February 28, 2015

Are things changing?

Three years ago I created this video about some of the ways my students and I were using technology in our grade one classroom.  

Since then THREE YEARS have passed and I wondering, are things changing in other classrooms? Have they changed enough? Have they changed too much? I'd love to hear your thoughts.


Thursday, February 19, 2015

REAL Personalized Learning for ALL, Now That is Innovation!


Ever since I started teaching (I’m in my 23rd year) I have always tried to find ways to individualize the programs in my classroom to best meet the needs of my students. In most cases that meant open-ended activities that allowed each of my students to take the challenge to their own level.  But with the introduction of technology into my classroom the reality is that as much as open-ended activities are good, utilizing technology properly allows me to provide what feels like endless opportunities for personalization and individual learning.  In the next ten years I believe REAL personalized learning for ALL students will be the most significant classroom innovation.

This might take on the form of alternative classroom design or alternative curriculum. It will mean re-looking at the role and purpose of school and tying it all back to what each individual student needs.  It will mean the elimination of grade levels and marks, and complete focus on learning and real life problem solving.  Less focus on content and more focus on core competencies such as communication, critical thinking, and problem solving.

It will mean the acceptance of various ways to create and show learning.  Student voices will show up in words, text, images, drawings, dance, etc… There will be no one right way to show learning.  Systems will be in place to enable children to learn in unique and individual ways and teachers will have strategies to assess this learning.

Technology will play a big role in personalization because it allows us to access a world full of information.  Networked learning will also play a key roll as no teacher is an expert in everything their students want to learn.  The relationship between students and teachers will become even stronger.

While I know personalization is not a new concept, there are far too many pulls from outside sources for it to really be happening properly in our schools.  I do believe REAL personalization is innovative and in ten years I hope it’s the norm and not the exception.


*This post is part of a series of monthly questions that Cathy Rubin is asking several education bloggers to respond to.  This month's question was "What will be the most significant classroom innovation in the next 10 years?"  It is an honour to be a part of this group.  Please check out the complete list of posts here. 

The Global Search for Educations: Our Top 12 Global Teacher Blogs - What will be the most significant classroom innovation in the next 10 years?

Monday, February 9, 2015

And the discussion continues....

After I pushed published on my most recent post on Documenting Student Learning,  a Twitter conversation broke out.  I love hearing the voices of so many educators. If you were not part of the live conversation I'd love to include you through sharing this storify of much of the conversation.  Please feel to jump in on this blog, on via twitter.



Documenting Student Learning

As British Columbia's curriculum is under a major transformation (major for some, reassurance of  practice for others) we are not only looking at a different approach (for some) to teaching and learning but also to reporting this student learning to parents.   My district has been piloting new reporting practices and some of us have been exploring Fresh Grade.  If you aren't familiar with Fresh Grade I have previously written about it here.  This past Friday I was fortunate to be invited to a discussion session that took a look at the Fresh Grade platform and how it can be used to document and share student learning privately with parents.

It was interesting to be a part of this discussion and to hear how other teachers in my district are working through this new 'portfolio' based way of reporting student learning.  While many in the room are just dipping their toes into using Fresh Grade, the conversations we had are what struck with me most.

The biggest discussion that I can't stop thinking about is what exactly should these portfolios contain?  The focus of what I have been including is the documentation of the 1:1 conferences I've been having with my students.  For example when I conference with a student over his/her writing I typically take a snapshot of the writing then ask my student what they are proud of.   I ask them what they would like to improve with their writing.  Together we talk about how they might go about doing this.  Sometimes I'll add to the conversation around what they should be proud of by pointing out great things they have done that they didn't  realize.  When necessary I'll also add to the goal setting part of the conversation. Then I typically sum this all up with a note or two directly for the parents suggesting ways they can help support their child's learning at home. Our entire conversation is documented and shared on their portfolio, and most often immediately sent home as a quick email snapshot too.

Obviously not everything being added to the portfolio is quite as rich in assessment information. I am trying my best to include  simple images, videos, and voice recordings of students going through the process of learning.   This type of documentation has allowed my students to have some pretty rich portfolios.

One thing that is missing from my students portfolios is where their learning is in relation to the widely held expectations of their age/grade level. This was what I've been thinking about since Friday.  Should these portfolios only show work  but not actually reference these work samples  to the widely held expectations?

Each and every day I tell my students that they are in my room exactly as they should be.  I don't ever compare the progress of one student, to the progress of another but instead I expect my students to regularly do their best work.  I see my job as their teacher to help push their learning forward so their best work continues to get better.  And yes, I have several students who are not yet with in those widely held expectations but instead of focussing on what they aren't yet able to do, I focus on what they are able to do and how we can continue to work together to push learning forward.

But as a parent looking into these portfolios am I doing enough?  Is it important for  a parent to know where their child is in the developmental process or does knowing that just become a road block to learning? Do I want students who are constantly reminded that they are not where they "should" be or do I want students who are focussed on constantly learning and improving.

For term one my report cards were based HEAVILY on these exact digital portfolios.  I did send home a simple one page letter with a paragraph comment speaking specifically to a child's social emotional growth, work habits etc.  It was only here on this single paper that I made reference to learning in relation to widely held expectations.  Specifically I wrote:

_________’s Language Arts skills are (not) within age expectations. 
_________’s Math skills are (not) within age expectations.

I wonder though, is this enough or maybe this is even too much.

Is it more important to document exactly where a child is in their learning journey, or is more important to be clear on where they are in that journey in relation to widely held expectations? Or is it a combination of both?  I'd love to hear your thoughts.